Too many variants — costs outpace sales
Small and mid-size seasonal brands often add styles, colours and sizes for novelty, for one boutique’s request or “for choice”. Each extra SKU pulls development, samples, material, production, stock and linesheet work. When weak, slow-moving variants stay in the catalogue, the line count grows faster than revenue — and the team loses focus on the styles that sell.
- collection breadth without retiring weak lines
- SKU costs spread across the whole season
- assortment decisions without a full sales picture
Every SKU carries cost through the season
Assortment complexity — more styles, colours and sizes than the collection sells.
SKU proliferation — the catalogue grows because new variants arrive faster than weak ones leave.
Sell-through — sold units as a share of delivered; a low result across many variants is a signal to review.
An extra colour is not only another linesheet row: it is a sample, a BOM, a material MOQ, a cut, QC, shelf space and a photo shoot. In B2B one boutique can be the source of “only that colour”; in DTC breadth can be a conversion guess. Without matching the catalogue to orders and sales, the decision to cut or keep breadth comes too late — often only once stock already sits.
Catalogue and sales in one decision view
We address excess collection complexity with one catalogue (collection → product → variant → size) and with sales and order data the brand uses to set breadth and depth.
- the collection holds styles and variants in one catalogue, so the offer is visible
- Analytics shows revenue, units and share by collection, product, colour and size — a product expands into variants
- orders show what boutiques and channels ordered
We assume the brand chooses breadth and depth; we show what is in the catalogue and what sold or ordered.
Steps
- 1In the collection, the product and variant list is reviewed — full offer breadth and depth in one catalogue.
- 2In Analytics ("Sales report"), the dimension is set to Collections / Products / Colours / Sizes and the season period.
- 3On a product, variants are expanded (colour · size) to see revenue, units and share per line.
- 4The result is compared with orders from the same season — which variants entered orders and which stayed only in the catalogue.
- 5The brand decides: keep, merge a colour, withdraw, or move to core / carryover — and updates the collection catalogue.
Example: SS26 collection, MERU pants, three colours.
| Colour | Units sold | Share of style revenue | Brand decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navy | 180 | 62% | keep |
| Ecru | 95 | 30% | keep |
| Sage | 12 | 8% | withdraw in AW |
On your side
- Set entry and exit criteria for a variant (for example sell-through, share of the style) before the season review.
- You decide breadth and depth; Go4 shows the catalogue plus sales and orders for that decision.
- After the decision, update the collection (archive / publish variants) so the linesheet and production read the same set.